NDM7708 - Government Debate
Tabled on 08/06/2021 | For debate on 15/06/2021To propose that the Senedd:
1. Agrees that the UK Government approach to the Levelling Up Fund and broader EU successor funding does not guarantee that Wales will not be a penny worse off and represents a clear assault on Welsh devolution.
2. Agrees that the pilot UK Community Renewal Fund for 2021-22 represents a significant cut in funding for Wales as the Welsh Government would have received at least £375m each year in the form of EU structural funds.
3. Notes that this cut in available funding threatens jobs and services in Wales.
4. Shares the concerns raised by the Welsh Local Government Association regarding the level of available funding and the process for delivery expressed in its evidence to the Welsh Affairs Committee regarding the UK Government’s proposals.
5. Notes the independent UK Industrial Strategy Council’s description of the UK Government’s Levelling Up plans as ‘centrally controlled funding pots thinly spread across a range of initiatives’.
6. Agrees that the UK Government has neither presented nor won a mandate to cut EU successor funds for Wales or unilaterally undermine Welsh devolution.
7. Believes that decisions about Wales should be taken in Wales and that the UK Government must stop using the Internal Market Act to diminish Wales’s say.
UK Community Renewal Fund: prospectus 2021-22
Welsh Local Government Association - oral evidence to the Welsh Affairs Committee - 27 May 2021
Tabled By
Amendments
Delete all and replace with:
To propose that the Senedd:
1. Notes the UK shared prosperity fund and its intention to reduce inequalities between communities across the UK.
2. Agrees that the annual budget for the UK shared prosperity fund should be no less than the EU and UK funding streams it replaces.
3. Welcomes the role of local government in the deployment of the UK Shared Prosperity Fund.
4. Calls upon Her Majesty's Government, local authorities and devolved administrations to develop a system to track and measure the impact and desired outcomes of the fund.
Tabled By
Insert as new points after point 2 and renumber accordingly:
Believes that the UK Government approach to the prioritisation criteria for these funds is inconsistent with that of predecessor EU funding based on need.
Calls for transparency from the UK Government on the prioritisation criteria for these funds to ensure no area in Wales misses out on funding.
Tabled By
Add as new point at end of motion:
Calls on the Welsh Government to lay before the Senedd an impact assessment showing the effect of these funding arrangements on the distribution of funding across Wales and devolved Welsh decision-making.